Excerpted from: "Blood groups and the history of peoples" in THE EAT RIGHT 4 YOUR TYPE ENCYCLOPEDIA
There is a vast span of human existence
of which little is known. Archeological ruins from the beginnings of
civilization have been unearthed, and there have been occasional discoveries of
a more prehistoric nature, but not much else. The impermanency of our physical
existence is responsible for this void; our flesh and body fluids rapidly
decompose after death. Unless preserved by extraordinary means, even skeletal
remains eventually crumble and disappear. Early peoples did not practice
ceremonial burial. Left to the elements, bodies soon completely decomposed:
"Dust to dust" was not a mere poetic metaphor. It was a recorded observation of
our transient natures.
Only in the last century have scientists and anthropologists begun using
biological markers such as the blood groups in the search for humanity’s imprint
on our distant past. These studies have allowed a greater understanding of the
movements and groupings of early peoples as they adapted to changing climates,
mutating germs, and uncertain food supplies. Recent analyses, using
sophisticated genetic measures, have produced the most accurate picture to date
of human evolution.
The variations, strengths and weaknesses of each blood group can be seen as part
of humanity’s continual process of acclimating to different environmental
challenges. Most of these challenges have involved the digestive and immune
systems. It is no surprise, then, thatmany of the distinctions between the blood
groups involve basic functions of our digestive and immune systems.Evolution is
usually considered in the context of millions of years, which is the time frame
needed to explain the many differences between animals or other species. Yet
humanity’s own life span provides ample time for the myriad number of small
day-to-day refinements, representing the constant struggle between inherited
traits and environmental challenges.
And, although evidence points to the fact that the individual genetic mutations
that produced the ABO genes are quite ancient (1) this is trivial importance
with regard to the actual demographics of the individual ABO blood groups in
ancient populations. In genetics it is not the actual age of the gene that
matters, it is its frequency or drift. This is computed by geneticists using a
formula called the Hardy-Weinberg equation. Hardy-Weinberg posits that if the
only evolutionary force acting on the population is random mating, the gene
frequencies remain unchanged constant. In essence if you start off with a small
number of a particular gene in a larger gene pool (such as the gene for blood
group B in the gene pool for ABO blood type) and nothing other than random
mating occurred, at the end of a period of time, you would still have a small
number of B genes in the ABO gene pool.
So something other than random mating is responsible for the present day
differences in frequency between the ABO blood groups; why for example, are
there such large populations of blood group O (40-45%) and A (35-40%) versus
much lower rates of groups B (4-11%) and AB (0-2%)?
First, it can be said that perhaps the mutation that produced the B gene was
just not as common an occurrence as the mutation that produced the A gene. Yet,
if they occurred at the same time, why would this be? Also, if the mutations are
of such paramount importance, why is the distribution of the B gene so
geographically limited to an area of high concentration stretching as a belt of
territory from the Himalayas to the Urals?
The answer lies not in the ancient nature of the mutations that produced the A
and B genes, but rather in the discreet interactions that occurred between early
man and his environment that were under the influence of his ABO blood group.
These included the areas and climates he chose to inhabit, each with their
unique populations of microbes and foods that he chose to catch or cultivate.
As humans migrated and were forced to adapt their diets to local conditions, the
new diets provoked changes in their digestive tracts and immune systems,
necessary for them to first survive and later thrive in their new habitats.
Different foods metabolized in a unique manner by each ABO blood group probably
resulted in that blood group achieving a certain level of susceptibility (good
or bad) to the endemic bacteria, viruses and parasites of the area. This
probably more than any other factor was what has influenced the modern day
distribution of our blood group. It is fascinating to note that virtually all
the major infectious diseases that ran so rampant throughout our pre-antibiotic
history have ABO blood group preferences of one group or another.(2)
This results from the fact that many microbes possess ABO "blood types" of their
own. It is perhaps useful to understand that the ABO blood group antigens are
not unique to humans, although humans are the only species with all four
variants. They are relatively simple sugars which arte abundantly found in
nature. A bacteria which for example possessed an antigen on its surface that
mimicked the blood group A antigen would have a much easier time infecting a
person who was group A, since that bacteria would more likely be considered
"self" to the immune system of a blood group A person. Also microbes may adhere
to the tissues of one ABO group in preference to another, by possessing
specialized adhesion molecules for that particular blood group.(3)
The horrors of the Black Plague, which ran unchecked throughout Europe in the
thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, is a perfect example. The Plague was a
disease caused by bacterial infection and was almost certainly fatal to those
who contracted it in the early years of its initial spread. By the fifteenth
century, however, fatalities were rare, although many people continued to
contract the infection. In just two generations, traits were developed in the
survivors that protected them from fatal infections. Since these traits were
necessary to survival, they were then passed on and retained as a form of
genetic memory.
The Black Plague is especially interesting from a perspective of the ABO blood
groups, since Yersinia is a bacteria with a preference for individuals of
specific ABO group, in this case, group O. (4,5)
The effects of ABO blood group on survival against most forms of epidemic
illness is so distinct that a modern day map of the ABO blood group distribution
in Europe closely parallels the locations of major epidemics, with higher
densities of blood group A and lower frequencies of blood group O in areas
historically known to have had long histories of repeated pandemics.
On the other hand, in pre-urbanization days the survival advantage would have
laid with blood group O as they are known to be more resistant to the flukes and
worms that routinely parasitized these early humans, probably because they are
the only blood group with antibodies against two other antigens, A and B.
These changes are reflected in the local success or failure of each of the blood
groups, which appear to have each had a moment of pre-eminence at a critical
juncture in our history. The ascent of humans to the top of the food chain (the
early advantage of blood group O), the change from hunter-gathering to a highly
concentrated, urban environment and agriculturally-based diet (the ascent of
blood group A), and the mingling and migration of the races from the African
homeland to Europe and Asia ( the opportunity for blood groups B and AB).
The Ancestral Foundation
From a purely scientific point of view, chemical analysis of the group O antigen
reveals that from a structural perspective, it is the simplest blood group and
it serves as the backbone for the synthesis of increasingly complex A, B and AB.
These later blood groups evolved by adding other sugars onto the basic O sugar,
much like a modern city might be built upon the foundations of an ancient one.
Thus if the mutations that produced the A and B antigens are ancient, the gene
for blood group O is infinitely older.
Another dimension testifying to the great antiquity of group O comes from the
science of physical anthropology and suggests that a greater part of humanity’s
existence has been lived exclusively as group O.
New studies on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) support the theory that Homo sapiens
emerged in Africa and only later infiltrated other regions. Unlike DNA, which is
inherited from both parents and changes minutely with each generation, mtDNA is
passed directly from mother to child. It is contained in eggs but not in sperm.
Since only random mutations alter its sequence, it is a more accurate measure of
the trajectory of human evolution. Extensive mtDNA studies demonstrate that
humans evolved from a common ancestor. These studies also confirm the theory
that the blood groups evolved as migratory mutations.
The extraordinarily high percentage of blood group O in "ancient" or otherwise
isolated populations also testifies to its great age. (6) Even though the early
migrations dispersed the gene for group O blood throughout the world, there are
some extraordinary examples of "old" populations existing in our world today.
Because of their geographic locations, these societies have remained isolated
from interaction with other populations. If A, B and O had developed
simultaneously, the isolated population groups would have had all of them. But
these "old societies" are group O because genes for the later blood groups never
had the opportunity to enter into their populations. They have remained
unchanged.
The Basques are an ancient people whose origins are still a mystery. The Basque
language, the only western European language not connected by Indo-European
roots, appears to be related to several dialects found in small isolated
populations in the valleys of the Caucasus Mountains. Although they look much
like their French and Spanish neighbors, Basques possess the lowest frequency of
blood group B---originally having no group B at all---and the highest
frequencies of blood group O in Europe. Cattle, abundant on the European plains,
and fresh water fish seem to have been the staples of their early existence, as
evidenced by the extraordinary renderings of the famous cave paintings found in
the Basque country.
More than fifty percent of the Basque population is Rh negative, as opposed to
sixteen percent for the rest of Europe. Like the gene for group O, the genetic
mechanism for the Rh negative blood type is simpler, hence undoubtedly older,
than the gene for Rh positive.
Native Americans are another example of the "old peoples" existing in our world
today. It has often been asserted that all full-blooded American Indians are
group O, and recent studies on largely intermingled Amerindian populations show
a very high (sixty-seven to eighty percent) predominance of O, indicating that
their migration from Asia to Alaska was probably much earlier than previously
believed.(7,8) Their high rate of blood group O suggests that the Amerindians
and Eskimos are directly descended from Cro-Magnon ancestors, probably
Mongolians, who migrated around 15,000 B.C. to the Americas. In contrast to the
Basques, however, the Asian Amerindians must have mingled extensively with other
Asian populations, picking up along the way the gene for Rh positive blood.
As with the Basques, few Native Americans are group B, so they must have
migrated to the Americas late enough to pick up the Rh positive gene, but too
early to pick up the gene for B. (9) This migration probably took place across
the land bridge that at one time connected Siberia to Alaska. As the last Ice
Age ebbed and the lands warmed and glaciers receded, the rising water levels
eliminated the land bridge between Asia and American, bottling up the Native
Americans and a high-O enclave and preventing for another 10,000 years any
communication between the continents. Forensic studies support this theory: in
Chile no B or AB have been noted either in pre-Columbian or Colonial mummies.
(19)
Another theory for the extremely high incidence of blood group O in Native
Americans is that O individuals seem relatively resistant to syphilis and
smallpox, major killers of Native Americans that were introduced into the Old
World by Columbus. (22)
Agricultural advances in the Americas were late in coming, because the new
American homeland was abundantly populated with game and fish, which discouraged
agriculture. Even corn, which was the staple grain, didn't appear to be
domesticated until 4500 B.C., and common beans appear to be an even more recent
addition, first being cultivated around 2200 B.C. So, like the Basques, meats
and not grains were the primary staple of the Native American diet.
In England, Wales and Scotland there is a strong association between ABO blood
group and geographical differences in the death rate (10) Studies of blood group
distribution in the British Isles show a general increase of group O frequency
from relatively low numbers in southern England to increasingly higher ones in
northern England, Wales, Scotland, and Ireland. (11) This suggests that the
Anglo-Saxons had relatively high A levels, and that O increased as the
proportion of Celtic ancestry increased, although the origin of the high
incidence of blood group O in the Irish may represent the remnants of Mesolithic
peoples. (23) This is also the case with continental Europe, where the
percentage of group O increases in northern Germans and Danes. It is also known
that the Icelanders had high O frequencies, close to those frequencies found in
the populations of Scotland and Ireland.
Among the Nomads of the Arabian Peninsula, and the Berbers of the Atlas
Mountains, two old populations, the frequency of the blood group O gene is high.
Africans, on average, have more O genes and less A genes than do Europeans. So
it can be seen that the gene carried by people who are blood group O is ancient
by evolutionary standards.
The Age of The Hunter-Gatherers
Our first human ancestors likely emerged in sub-Sahara Africa between 170,000
and 50,000 years ago. These ancestors probably ate a rather crude, omnivorous
diet of plants, grubs, and the scavenged leftovers of other, more successful
predatory animals. Since humans have neither the sharp teeth or claws of a true
predator, one could speculate that these people were perhaps as much prey as
predator. Yet within these early humans lay the greatest predatory tool yet
devised: The human brain.
In a study reported in the journal Science, anthropologists said their tests of
the carbon content of teeth of Australopithecus africanus indicate that these
individuals ate large quantities of food rich in carbon 13 - like grasses and
sedges - or animals that ate these plants, or both. The research indicated that
the australopithecines, which walked upright but also climbed trees, were
already venturing out of their usual forest habitat to forage in open
grasslands. It also suggested that hominids were consuming high-protein animal
foods before the development of stone tools for butchering. They noted that many
theories of human origins invoke a switch to a meat-rich diet to explain the
sudden expansion of brain size with the first Homo species. If they were eating
meat, it probably came from small animals that could be caught without tools or
the scavenged remains of meals left by large predators. (12)
Perhaps I am not alone in recognizing the paradoxical nature of a high meat diet
being the driving factor behind the dramatic growth of the human brain, the
result being the production of nutritionists who advise a vegetarian diet for
virtually everyone.
Big game hunting by humans started in Africa about half a million years ago,
although the full force of armed human bands may not have been felt much before
100,000 B.C Early human's relationship to their environment changed dramatically
with the appearance of our first direct ancestor, Cro-Magnon, around 40,000 B.C.
Named for a site in France where remains were first identified and studied,
Cro-Magnons developed the beginnings of communication and tool working, and were
also superb hunters. Using simple signals and gestures, they began to hunt in
organized packs, wielding bone or simple stone weapons. This major advance
catapulted what had been one of the less successful primates all the way to the
top of the food chain. As skillful and formidable hunters, Cro-Magnons soon had
little to fear from any animal rival.
Cro-Magnons possessed such modern human features as a higher, vertical forehead,
a reduced brow ridge, a smaller face and teeth, and a chin. Their skeletons
indicate great muscularity, suggesting they were employed in much more strenuous
activities than are most modern peoples.
By the time of the Cro-Magnons, hunting and the consumption of a mostly
carnivorous diet had become a way of life. It was in the midst of this
carnivorous frenzy that the digestive attributes of Blood Group O reached its
full expression, with the highly efficient acid and pepsin production of the
stomach geared for the digestion of meat. With no natural predators (other than
themselves), and an assured supply of game, the population of wily, physically
agile Cro-Magnon hunters must have flourished.
Once early humans had gained ascendancy, it took a surprisingly short time for
them to deplete the numbers of major game animals. By 50,000 B.C., most large
game herds were already extinct in Africa. The scarcity of a primary food source
led to widespread migration in search of new and fertile hunting grounds. The
feast had come to an end. It had been a fairly routine task to feed a small
hunting group on the kill of a single enormous animal carcass for a week or
more. Now, having to hunt and kill a sufficient number of small game, most of
whom proved fast and elusive, was much more difficult. Hunger began to take its
toll on the previously successful tribes of hunters. The young, old, and weak
fell by the wayside, succumbing to disease and starvation. Bands of hunters
began warring with each other for the limited food supply.
This depletion of the large game in Africa, coupled with climatic changes and
possibly population pressures encouraged early humans to begin moving out of
Africa. The more barren northern areas, previously covered with ice, had started
to warm, while a shift in the trade winds began to parch and desiccate what had
once been fertile land in the African Sahara.
All of these factors joined together into what was quite possibly the greatest
series of migrations in human history. These migrations seeded the planet with a
base population of blood group O, helping to make it the widespread and
ubiquitous blood group it continues to be to this day.
The Wanderings
By 30,000 B.C., bands of Cro-Magnons were migrating eastwards and northwards in
search of new hunting lands. By 20,000 B.C., migration into Europe and Asia was
so significant that large game herds began disappearing from those areas as
well. Other food sources had to be discovered, and the search was a desperate
one. Under these pressures, our ancestors may have become omnivorous again,
feeding on a broader menu of new plant and animal species. In particular, the
food resources of the shore and the sea were systematically exploited for the
first time.
Cro-Magnons were getting smarter and more creative, developing more
sophisticated housing and clothing. These alterations allowed bands of hunters
to search for new game herds in northern grasslands and forests. By l0,000 B.C.,
human hunting groups occupied all the main land masses of the earth, except for
Antarctica. Hunting bands found their way to Australia between 40,000 and 30,000
years ago. Some 5,000 to 15,000 years later, other bands managed to cross the
Bering Strait from Asia and entered the Americas. In these later, relatively
more sophisticated hunting societies, the extermination of large game
accelerated. Cro-Magnon hunting methods were becoming increasingly efficient, as
evidenced by the vast number of animal bones piled up at some of the recently
unearthed archeological sites. At Solutre, France for example, the remains of
more than 10,000 horses have been found. At Dolni Vestonice in the Czech
Republic, a large number of bones from extinct mammoths litter the site. Some
archeologists estimate that from the time human migration to the Americas began
about 15,000 years ago, it took less than one thousand years to exterminate most
of the large game in North and South America. The reason that the Aztec
civilization was so easily toppled by the Spanish Conquistadors was the sheer
terror that the horse-mounted warriors brought to the relatively primitive Aztec
foot soldiers. Horses were previously unknown to the Aztecs---in earlier
migrations from north to central America, their ancestors had exterminated the
wild horses of the American plains, slaughtering them for food. They had no idea
that horses could be utilized to far greater purposes than as a food source.
The expansion of Cro-Magnon hunting bands across the earth has been called "a
period of unalloyed success for humankind". The effect of a carnivorous diet on
human growth was profound. The movement of the early humans to more temperate
climates stimulated genetic responses. They developed lighter skins, less
massive bone structures, and straighter hair. The skeleton, especially in
Caucasians, matures slowly, and their lighter skin is better protected than
darker skin against frostbite. Lighter skin is also better able to metabolize
vitamin D, vital to survival in a land of shorter days and longer nights.
The dominance of the Cro-Magnons eventually brought about their own downfall.
They suffered greatly from their own success. Overpopulation soon led to the
exhaustion of available hunting grounds. Before long, most of the large game
herds in the populated regions were destroyed by overhunting. This led to
increased competition for a limited food supply. Competition led to war, and war
to further migration.
The Agricultural Dawning
The Neolithic Period, or "New Stone Age" followed the "Old Stone Age" or
Paleolithic period of the Cro-Magnon hunters, beginning around 30,000 B.C.
Agriculture and animal domestication are generally recognized as the hallmarks
of its culture. The ability to cultivate grains and livestock allowed these
early people to forgo the hand-to-mouth existence of their nomadic ancestors,
and settle down in cities, allowing for substantial population concentrations.
The British prehistorian V. Gordon Childe coined the term "Neolithic Revolution"
to describe the change from a hunting and gathering society to one based on food
production, and he considered it the greatest advance in human history after the
marshaling of fire.
The Neolithic Period was also an important watershed in the distribution of the
ABO blood groups. This new, relatively sedentary, agrarian lifestyle and the
major change in diet resulted in a new mutation in the digestive tracts and
immune systems of these early people. Many of them became carriers of group A
blood. The blood group A variant allowed humans to tolerate and better
assimilate grains and other agricultural products. Blood group A initially
appeared in any significant numbers in the early Caucasian peoples, sometime
between 25,000 and 15,000 B.C., somewhere in western Asia or the Middle East.
The gene for group A was carried into western Europe and Asia during the
movement of these Neolithic societies, especially a branch termed the
Indo-Europeans, where it penetrated extensively into the pre-Neolithic Type O
populations.
The Indo-Europeans appeared originally in South Central Russia, and between 3500
and 2000 B.C. spread southward into Southwestern Asia, especially to Iran and
Afghanistan. At some point after this, they began to spread again, this time
further westward, into Europe. Not only did their migration serve to transport
the gene for group A to pre-Neolithic hunter-gatherers, but it also served as a
major catalyst in stimulating the adoption of Neolithic developments, such as
agriculture. Almost all modern Europeans share a common ancestry with the
Indo-European peoples.
The invasion of the Neolithic Indo-Europeans was scattershot and incomplete. In
some areas, pre-Neolithic societies were obliterated through warfare and
intermingling, while leaving others, such as the Basques of Spain, relatively
alone and intact.
The Neolithic Revolution was the original "diet revolution," as it introduced
new foods and lifestyle habits into the simpler immune systems and digestive
tracts of the early hunter-gatherers, and produced the environmental stress
necessary to spark the development of a new blood group variation, A. As the
digestive tract of this new blood group gradually lost its ability to digest the
carnivorous diet of the hunter-gatherers, the simpler, pre-agricultural diet
dependent largely on hunting and gathering disappeared.
The Emergence of The Collective
Settling into permanent communities presented new developmental challenges; the
individualistic tendencies of the hunter-gatherer now gave way to a more
structured society. Skill specialization can only evolve as part of a larger
whole; the basket weaver is dependent on the farmer, the farmer on the
toolmaker. One no longer thought of food only when hungry; fields needed to be
sown and cultivated in anticipation of future reward.
The cultivation of wheat and barley, coupled with the domestication of food
animals such as sheep, goats, pigs, chickens, and later cattle, first occurred
between 9000 and 5000 B.C. in southwestern Asia, a fertile mixing ground in
which all three major races co-mingled.
The new farming economies spread slowly from southeast Europe to the north and
west. The permanent settlements that developed as a result of the new agrarian
society gave rise to the early cities.
Neolithic sites in southeast Europe date from before 6000 B.C., and are located
in areas with the most workable soils and temperate climate. Cattle, sheep, or
pigs, in addition to wheat, barley, peas, beans, and flax, were raised. By 4000
B.C., a series of settlements were established on the lake shores of
Switzerland, and agriculture was adapted to the Alpine environment, with
emphasis on cattle, legumes, and fruit, in addition to wheat.
Cereal crops and cattle were introduced to western France by 4000 B.C., and were
in use in southern Scandinavia, the British Isles, and in the northern European
plains by about 3500 B.C., pushing the remaining hunter-gatherer peoples farther
north into the wilderness, or influencing them to adopt the new, settled mode of
life. 4000 B.C. marked the beginning of the Neolithic period in Britain and
Ireland, and is denoted by an extensive clearing of the forests at that time for
agriculture, burial rituals, and the building of "megalithic" structures, such
as Stonehenge in England.
There is good evidence to support the link between the ascendancy of blood group
A and the development of the urban society. As discussed, many areas of the
world that have long histories of urbanization and frequent outbreaks of plague,
cholera, and smallpox show a predominance of group A over group O. This
statistic clearly proved that group A was more resistant to and able to survive
the infections common to densely populated areas. One might well wonder how
blood group O survived at all-much less how it has remained to this day the most
ubiquitous blood group on the planet. One reason might be the sheer amount of
group O in the gene pool; it is recessive in A and B and thus remains
self-replicating.
Blood group A is found in the highest concentrations among western Europeans.
Unlike blood groups B and O, there are many varieties of group A. The major
grouping, A1, accounts for about ninety-five percent of all A blood. The largest
subgroup, A2, is found principally in Northern Caucasians. A2 is found in very
high concentration in Iceland and Scandinavia, particularly among the Lapps,
ancient settlers of the area. They are almost unique in their high frequency of
A, and have the highest frequency of A2, registering forty-two percent in one
group. The A2 gene is almost entirely confined to Caucasian populations.
The European frequency of group A decreases as we head eastwards. Over much of
Europe the frequency of the A gene is greater than twenty-five percent. It is
also found in considerable numbers around the entire Mediterranean Sea,
particularly in Corsica, Sardinia, Spain, Turkey, and the Balkans. It is clear
that humankind most often laid down permanent settlements in those areas where
conditions offered them the best chance of survival.
The Nomadic Mutation
The gene for blood group B first appeared in significant numbers somewhere
around 10 to 15,000 B.C., the tail end of the Neolithic period, in the area of
the Himalayan highlands now part of present day Pakistan and India. Like the
environmental conditions which spawned the advent of group A, the development of
blood group B was in large part a response to changes in the environment. But
unlike A, which began to supplant group O as a response to new types of
infections, then thrived as a result of the new dietary changes, group B appears
to have been more of a response to climatic changes, followed by a different set
of dietary adaptations. Life in the tropical flat savannahs of eastern Africa
gave way to a harsher existence as the Cro-Magnon hunters migrated to the
colder, drier, mountainous areas of the subcontinent and the barren endless
plains of the central Asian steppes.
It is possible that blood group B may have been the only blood group with the
capabilities to survive in such a harsh environment. There is some science
behind this theory: For example, variability in the levels of the hormones
testosterone, estradiol, and somatotropic hormones in mountaineers of the Pamirs
and Kirghizes was examined in relation to their place of residence in terms of
elevation above sea level. At high altitudes blood O group had had lower
concentrations of estradiol and testosterone, blood group B the highest. (13)
Under times of famine, two biologic functions diminish: First is the ability to
fend off infection. And the second is the ability to reproduce. Essentially
omnivores, group B may have been the only blood group whose immune systems were
capable of functioning with a diet described by one Roman historian as "soured
milk and mare's blood." In addition to having the ability to survive pestilence,
blood group B women may be more fertile than the A and O counterparts (14) and
may begin to menstruate earlier. (15)
Higher concentrations of the group B gene exists in direct relationship with the
demographics of the pre-existing caste system. Since the caste system was the
direct result of consecutive layers of foreign conquest, it appears that the B
gene may have been introduced into the Indian subcontinent via conquest. (16) In
a study among fourteen Hindu caste groups, besides Christian and Muslim
populations of West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India All the Hindu
castes except Brahmin, Kshatriya and Reddy exhibited relatively higher frequency
of group B over group A (24) In a study of ABO distribution along the Silk Route
of Northwestern China a distinct increase of blood group B was seen, especially
when those subjects of Mongolian extraction were compared to Caucasian. (25)
An almost continuous belt of mountainous terrain extends from the Urals in
Russia to the Caucasus in Asia, and then onto the Pyrenees of southern France.
This barrier split the migrations of the blood groups into two basic routes; a
northern stream and a southern one. The invaders taking the southern approach
became the ancestors of the Mediterranean people and western Europeans, and
carried with them the gene for blood group A. The Ural Mountains prevented a
large migration westwards from Asia, although small numbers of Caucasians
entered eastern Europe, carrying with them the gene for blood group B that they
picked up by intermingling with the Asian Mongolians. This barrier served to
divide blood groups into a western group, A; and an eastern group, B.
Blood group B Mongolians continued to travel northward, toward present day
Siberia. They developed a different culture, dependent on herding, and
emphasizing the use of cultured dairy products. These nomadic people were expert
horsemen, and wandered extensively over the Siberian flat lands, the great
Steppes. These nomads must have been compact, tightly knit, and genetically
homogenous. A recent study using sophisticated polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
technology determined the ABO groupings of on the dried remains of nine human
mummies which had been discovered at Taklamakan desert in 1912. Of the nine,
eight were group B. (17) At various times they penetrated large swaths of
Eastern Europe, at one time reaching as far as the gates of Vienna, Austria. The
Mongolians were certainly responsible for introducing the gene for blood group B
into the eastern European populations.
Two basic blood group B population patterns emerged out of the Neolithic
revolution in Asia: an agrarian, relatively sedentary population located in the
south and east, and the wandering nomadic societies of the north and west. This
schism stands as an important cultural remnant in Southern Asian cuisine—the use
of dairy products remains practically nonexistent. To the Asian culture, dairy
products are considered the food of the barbarian.
In the Middle-East it appears that tribes of Semitic group B nomads may have
infiltrated into pre-existing Neolithic cultures, both passively and
aggressively. Semitic peoples called the Hyksos were foreign rulers of Egypt
during the Second Intermediate Period. Exactly who those foreign rulers were is
not known, but it is assumed they were Asiatics. The Egyptian term for Hyksos
merely means "rulers of foreign lands." It was once thought that foreign rule in
Egypt would have necessarily entailed a violent overthrow, but instead there is
the appearance of a peaceful takeover. More likely, the numbers of these
foreigners slowly increased in the Delta region until they became a powerful
political force. Under the rule of the Hyksos, the continuity of Egyptian
culture and ritual was preserved, indicating that these foreign kings had become
fully Egyptianized. Persian suzerainty may have also added large amount of B
gene to the upper-class Egyptian gene pool, since a third century BC Egyptian
mummy, 'Iset Iri Hetes' was recently typed and found to be group B. (18)
Interestingly, Africa in general (independent of any racial categorization) has
a higher incidence of group B than Europe or the Middle East. Whether this is
the result of intermingling or the original B gene pool is unknown, however it
does imply that the links between ancient Egypt and sub-Saharan Africa are
deeper and older than generally recognized.
The blood group characteristics of the various Jewish populations have long been
of interest to anthropologists. As a general rule, regardless of their
nationality or race, there is a trend towards higher than average rates of blood
group B. The Ashkenazim of Eastern Europe and the Sephardim of the Middle East
and Africa, the two major sects, share high rates of group B blood and bear no
discernible differences. Babylonian Jews differ considerably from the
present-day Arab population of Iraq, in that they have a high frequency overall
of group A, and an even higher frequency of group B blood.
The Jews of the Tafilalet Oasis in Morocco, an ancient community, now dispersed,
also had a high frequency of the gene for blood group B, around twenty nine
percent of the total society. The Karaites, who have an extraordinarily high
rate of blood group B, are members of a Jewish sect founded in Babylonia in the
eighth century A.D. A singular community of Karaites continues to exist in
Lithuania, and they were known to have migrated as a body from the Crimea. The
Karaites consider themselves Jews by religion only, not by race. This claim of
racial separation was accepted by the Nazi authorities, who controlled Lithuania
during the Second World War. Because of this, the Karaites were spared the
horrors of the Holocaust. (6)
To modern day anthropologists, blood group B continues to this day to be an
"Eastern" blood group. It is found in high numbers among Asians such as the
Chinese, Indians, and Siberians. In Europe, blood group B is more frequently
found in Hungarians, Russians, Poles, and other eastern Europeans. It is not
found in large numbers among western Europeans. Among pre-Neolithic people, such
as the Basques and Amerindians, group B is practically nonexistent.
Of all the ABO blood groups, B shows the most clearly defined geographic
distribution. Stretching as a great belt across the Eurasian plains and down to
the Indian subcontinent, blood group B is found in increased numbers from Japan,
Mongolia, China and India, up to the Ural Mountains. From there westward, the
percentages fall until a low is reached at the extreme western end of Europe.
Blood group B is a distinctly non-Indo-European blood type. In Europe, only two
areas with a high rate of blood group B appear: one among the group of
non-Indo-European peoples known as the Finno-Ugrics (such as the Hungarians and
the Finns), the other among the central Slavic peoples (Czechs, Southern Poles,
and Northern Serbs). The Viking invaders may have also had a relatively high
percentage of B gene, since many of the towns of Britain and western Europe that
are linked to the coast by internal lines of communication such as large rivers,
have a disproportional amount of blood group B when compared to the surrounding
territory.
The small numbers of blood group B in old and Western Europeans represents
western migration by Asian nomadic peoples. This is most clearly seen in the
easternmost Western Europeans, the Germans and Austrians, who have an
unexpectedly high incidence of blood group B blood compared to their western
neighbors. The highest frequency of blood group B in Germans occurs in the area
around the upper and middle Elbe River, an important natural boundary between
"civilization" and "barbarism" in ancient and medieval times.
Modern subcontinental Indians, a Caucasian people, have some of the highest
frequencies of blood group B in the world. Interestingly, among the Asiatics,
they and the Japanese are the only areas that show high frequencies of blood
group A as well. The northern Chinese and Koreans have high rates of blood group
B, and lower rates of blood group A. Nowadays, blood group B accounts for about
ten percent of the world’s population.
The Intermingling
Blood group AB is found in less than five percent of the population. It is
certainly the most recent blood group. Unlike the other Abo blood groups, group
AB resulted from the intermingling of group A Caucasian people and group B
Mongolian people. Some of this may have been peaceful, some must have been part
of the violent turmoil that marked the great "Migration of Peoples" at the end
of the Ancient Period (300AD-800AD)
This time period was characterized by the collapse of the ancient civilizations,
brought on by the influx of various wandering hordes of predominantly Eastern
origin. The incidence of blood group B was probably very high in these Steppe
dwellers, so the appearance of group AB in Europe is probably the result of the
intermingling of these Eastern invaders with their European hosts. In Europe,
the distribution of this blood group parallels group B, with a low incidence in
Western Europeans. There is a very high incidence of AB blood in subcontinental
Indians, again probably the result of migration, conquest, caste distinctions
and intermingling .
Little evidence for the occurrence of group AB extends beyond 900 to 1,000 years
ago, when a large western migration of Eastern peoples took place. Blood group
AB is rarely found in European graves prior to 900 A.D. Studies of prehistoric
grave exhumations in Hungary indicate a distinct lack of this blood group into
the Langobard age (fifth to seventh century A.D.). This would seem to indicate
that, up until that point in time, European populations of blood groups A and B
did not come into common contact. If they did, they neither mingled nor
intermarried.
Blood group AB may be a purely human invention. This blood group takes the
concept of tolerance to the extreme, as it sees all things A-like or B-like as
self, and manufactures no opposing blood group antibodies. As early as the 1940s
it was noticed that blood group AB had a higher incidence of cancer than the
other blood groups. On the plus side, group AB’s tolerance perhaps minimizes the
chances of allergies and other autoimmune diseases, such as arthritis and
inflammation.
There may be a similar survival benefit with regard to possession of a B antigen
that is shared between groups B and AB. For example, it has been noted that
group B individuals are on average a bit taller than their A and O counterparts,
(20) and that women who are AB are in general a bit heavier than the other ABO
groups.(21)
Something about AB "works" in a modern sense, because these people inherit the
tolerance of both A and B. Perhaps this serves to enhance the AB immune system's
abilities to manufacture more specific antibodies to microbial invaders, as it
possess neither anti-A or anti-B antibodies.
Blood Group Distribution Today
Our blood groups are not a hit or miss act of random genetics without any real
purpose. Rather, the ABO blood groups are a set of differing solutions to a host
of environmental variables, such as diet and infection, which insured the
survival of the human race. The blood group adaptations were a change in "human
antigenicity"---a biological desire to identify with the prevailing currents of
the environment.
By looking at the distribution of blood groups today, we can see the threads of
our evolutionary history. In the United States, O is the most prevalent blood
group, A is second, followed by B, and finally AB. The breakdown in Great
Britain is very similar to the U.S. percentages. In Germany there are slightly
more A than O; B and AB remain almost the same as U.S. percentages. In Japan and
China As, Os and Bs are fairly evenly split, and the AB percentage increases
over that found in European populations.
Until the end of the Second World War, physical anthropology usually meant the
comparison of various physical characteristics of the body between different
human populations and individuals. This usually included measurements of the
body and its parts, especially the skull. However probably as a result of the
intensive use of blood transfusions during the war the blood groups have come to
provide an alternative to the often highly subjective methods of body
measurement. Here was a definitive biological marker, that could be used to map
migrations and classify human groupings. Physical anthropology had its first
scientific tool.
"History is bunk," wrote the industrialist Henry Ford. It is a quote with the
ring of truth in it. We are destined to interpret past events through the eyes
of who left the record (usually the winner) and our own modern day thoughts and
rationales. Losers rarely write history and it is just about impossible for the
average person to put himself or herself in the mindset of a person living in a
world without light, heat, supermarkets and the internet.
Yet of all my writings on the blood groups, it has been their anthropologic
significance that readers have time and again told me is their favorite section.
There is something very intellectually and emotionally riveting about
understanding the ebb and flow of our human experience. Not only is it
fascinating from an intellectual standpoint, but we also can see, feel and touch
the modern day physical ramifications of these long ago events.
In that sense, we are all survivors.
I receive no moneys for sharing this excerpt from "EAT RIGHT 4 YOUR TYPE: THE COMPLETE BLOOD TYPE ENCYCLOPEDIA" by Dr. D'Adamo.
Music by Project Divinity - Second Awakening
REFERENCES
1. O'hUigin C, Sato A, Klein J. Evidence for convergent evolution of A and B
blood group antigens in primates. Hum Genet 1997 Dec;101(2):141-148
2. Garratty G. Blood group antigens as tumor markers, parasitic/bacterial/viral
receptors, and their association with immunologically important proteins.
Immunol Invest. 1995 Jan-Feb;24(1-2):213-32
3. Jorgensen G. Human genetics and infectious diseases. MMW Munch Med Wochenschr.
1981 Sep 25;123(39):1447-52.
4. Pestana de Castro AF, Perreau P, Rodrigues AC, Simoes M. Haemagglutinating
properties of Pasteurella multocida type A strains isolated from rabbits and
poultry. Ann Microbiol (Paris). 1980 May-Jun;131(3):255-63.
5. Doughty BR. The changes in ABO blood group frequency within a mediaeval
English population. Med Lab Sci. 1977 Oct;34(4):351-4.
6. Mourant AE Blood Relations: Blood Groups and Anthropology Oxford Press
7. Harb Z, Llop E, Moreno R, Quiroz D. Coastal Chilean populations: genetic
markers in four locations. Rev Med Chil. 1998 Jul;126(7):753-60.
8. Gorodezky C, Castro-Escobar LE, Escobar-Gutierrez A. The HLA system in the
prevalent Mexican Indian group: the Nahuas. Tissue Antigens. 1985
Jan;25(1):38-46.
9. Solovenchuk LL. Genetic structure of the populations of native inhabitants in
the northeastern USSR. III. Asiatic Eskimo and the coast and reindeer Chukchi].
Genetika. 1984 Nov;20(11):1902-9
10. Mitchell JR. An association between ABO blood-group distribution and
geographical differences in death-rates. Lancet. 1977 Feb 5;1(8006):295-7.
11. Mascie-Taylor CG, Lasker GW. Migration and changes in ABO and Rh blood group
clines in Britain. Hum Biol. 1987 Apr;59(2):337-44.
12. Wilford JN. Study of Prehumans' Teeth Suggests That They Dined on Meat. The
NY Times International, Friday January 15, 1999
13. Spitsyn VA, Bets LV, Anikeeva AV, Spitsyna NK. Influence of environmental
and genetic factors on levels of testosterone, estradiol and somatotropic
hormones in mountaineers of the Pamir. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk 1997;7:46-51
14. A. J. Kelso, T. Siffert and A. Thieman Do type B women have more offspring?:
An instance of asymmetrical selection at the ABO blood group locus. Amer J.
Human Biology. (7) 1995; 41-44
15. Balgir RS. Menarcheal age in relation to ABO blood group phenotypes and
haemoglobin-E genotypes. J Assoc Physicians India 1993 Apr;41(4):210-211
16. Sengupta S, Dutta MN. Genetic investigations among the Ahom of Assam. J
Indian Med Assoc 1991 Jan;89(1):13-5
17. Lin Z, Kondo T, Minamino T, Sun E, Liu G, Ohshima T. Genotyping of ABO blood
group system by PCR and RFLP on mummies discovered at Taklamakan desert in 1912.
Nippon Hoigaku Zasshi. 1996 Oct;50(5):336-42.
18. Klys M, Opolska-Bogusz B, Prochnicka B. A serological and histological study
of the Egyptian mummy 'Iset Iri Hetes' from the Ptolemaic period III-IB. C.
Forensic Sci Int. 1999 Jan 25;99(3):229-33.
19. Allison MJ, Hossaini AA, Munizaga J, Fung R. ABO blood groups in Chilean and
Peruvian mummies. II. Results of agglutination-inhibition technique. Am J Phys
Anthropol. 1978 Jul;49(1):139-42.
20. Borecki IB, Elston RC, Rosenbaum PA, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. ABO
associations with blood pressure, serum lipids and lipoproteins, and
anthropometric measures. Hum Hered 1985;35(3):161-170
21. A. J. Kelso, W. Maggi and K. L. Beals. Body weight and ABO blood types: Are
AB females heavier? Amer J. Human Biology (6) 1994; 385-387
22. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Menozzi, P., & Piazza, A. The History and Geography
of Human Genes (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994)
23. Tills D, Teesdale P, Mourant AE. Blood groups of the Irish. Ann Hum Biol
1977 Jan;4(1):23-4
24. Vijayalakshmi M, Naidu JM, Suryanarayana B. Blood groups, ABH saliva
secretion and colour vision deficiency in Hindu castes and religious groups of
West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India. Anthropol Anz 1994 Dec;52(4):305-13
25. Iwasaki M, Kobayashi K, Suzuki H, Anan K, Ohno S, Geng Z, Li G, Inoko H.
Polymorphism of the ABO blood group genes in Han, Kazak and Uygur populations in
the Silk Route of northwestern China. Tissue Antigens 2000 Aug;56(2):136-42