HIGH COST OF MEDICINE
Upgrade your Flash Player to version 8 to view this video! (Click
here for the download) Brainwashing is the subtle art of
getting someone to believe something that really isn’t true and/or change
their opinion to what you want them to believe. To accomplish this, all you
need to do is exert a certain amount of influence over the subject for an
extended period of time. In this case, the subjects are the
American people. The influence is bought to the tune of $30 billion
a year and growing. Who’s doing the brainwashing? You probably already guessed
it: the drug industry. According to a study published
recently in The New England Journal of Medicine, the
total amount spent on pharmaceutical promotion was $29.9 billion in 2005, up
from only $11.4 billion in 1996. In excess of $25 billion of that was spent to
influence medical doctors, hospitals, etc., and more than $4 billion was spent
on direct-to-consumer advertising. This is a 330 percent increase over the
same period. Thirty billion dollars – just think
about it. That’s more than the annual budget expenditures by all but 10 states
in the U.S. The drug companies could buy entire countries! But instead, they
spend it to influence the American people. If you wanted to spread your
influence around, what could you buy? With that kind of money, you could
easily buy such things as: magazine publishers legislators hospital administrators
television stations medical researchers federal regulators radio programs high-powered attorneys celebrity spokes people The list is almost endless. In fact,
with that much money spent every year, you could influence, if not control,
the thoughts and actions of the American consumer. Don’t think so? A recent study
published in the August issue of Pediatrics provides the proof. In
2004, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family
Physicians released a clinical practice guideline on the
management of acute otitis media. The guideline included the
“endorsement” of a wait-and-see option, rather than the immediate use of
antibiotics. The year the guideline was released,
88 percent of medical physicians believed this recommendation was reasonable.
That number slipped a little to 83.3 percent by 2006. But when asked if they
were using the wait-and-see option, only 15 percent of medical physicians
answered in the affirmative. When asked why they didn’t use the non drug
option, 83.5 percent stated that it was because the parents of the children
preferred the antibiotic route. If you’re a drug company, that’s mission
accomplished. But wait, there’s more. Another
recent study demonstrated that the risk of a 7-year-old child suffering from
Asthma is significantly increased, if they are given antibiotics in their first
year. This turns a base hit into a home run. With one simple
prescription, the drug companies have turned selling one or more courses of
antibiotics to a small child with an earache into Asthma medication for life!
How did they do it? They spent $25
billion a year to encourage the doctor to give the parents the choice of if
not outright recommend drugs, and spent another $4 billion every year to
convince the parents drugs were the right choice. The drug companies only
failing, in their eyes, is that they only brainwashed 83.5 percent of the
medical doctors. Looks as if they need to really target that remaining 16.5
percent and help them understand the advantages of recommending drugs over a
wait-and-see approach. Doctors of Chiropractic are the last
remaining health profession whose philosophy doesn’t begin with drugs. We have
an obligation to tell that story, and our patients need to hear it first.
That’s one of the reasons they come to us. We also need to tell the rest of
the world, even if we have to do it one new patient at a time. The
consequences of not speaking out about the dangers of drugs are too severe.
By Donald M. Petersen Jr., BS, HCD (hc), FICC (h) References Donohue JM, Cevasco M, Rosenthal
MB. A decade of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs.
NEJM, Aug. 16, 2007;357(7):673-81. Vernacchio L, Vezina RM, Mitchell
AA. Management of acute otitis media by primary care physicians: trends
since the release of the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics/American
Academy of Family Physicians clinical practice guideline. Pediatrics,
2007;120:281-87. Kozyrskyj AL, Ernst P, Becker AB.
Increased risk of childhood asthma from antibiotic use in early life.
Chest, 2007;131(6):1753-1759.
DMP Jr. The information on MY
PATIENTS WEBSITE with Dr. Tindall, D.C., C.C.S.T. are provided for the purposes
of education only and is not intended as a substitute for advice from your
physician or other health care professional. Any products recommend or claims
made about specific products on or through this site have not been evaluated by
the United States Food and Drug Administration and are not intended to diagnose,
treat, cure or prevent disease. . You should not use the information on this
site for diagnosis or treatment of any health problem or for prescription of any
medication or other treatment. You should consult with a healthcare professional
before starting any diet, exercise or supplementation program, before taking any
medication, or if you have or suspect you might have a health problem.
Disclaimer: All of the videos
that I have provided here at My Patients Web Site are for educational purposes
only.
If you wish to contact the person(s) who
have made these videos, please do so. But, please understand that I
personally may not agree with every part of their video or statements.
Video
on your website
The Brainwashing Is Working